Rule 3: Three's a crowd

Not forgetting Rule 1, all cyclists are evil, the number of cyclists dictate the level / intensity of direction they must receive via the CCB.  When faced with reporting news of a large group , it is often worth opening with "I don't mind the lone cyclist or someone commuting to work" first, to give the oncoming justice to appear more rounded.
This does give the same impression as "some of my best friends are cyclists" but no one will believe that a) you have befriended a cyclists or b) cyclists have friends.
The optimum number of cyclists in a group (or "murder of cyclists") is defined by the formula as n-1, where n is the actual number of cyclists observed.  The preferred value for "n" is of course 1.

Rule 2: Death is too good for 'em

No view is too extreme and comments such as placing diesel in the path of a known event or calling them "the cancer" of Cranleigh should be the norm.  No KOC should criticise such posts, leave that to the lycra-sympathisers. 
A KOC does not need to endorse via a "like" but such views should be applied liberally to maintain Rule 1 in high regard.  Physical violence, such as hitting them with your car or jumping out and giving them a good old fashioned thump in the face, should be mentioned frequently whether you intend to or not.  If a frenzy of posts results in direct KOC action, this shall not be spoken of in the CCB.

Rule 1: They're all the same!

"There all rude and most have no road savvy, that’s why drivers hate them!!" as Brother David puts it, and while he meant "they're" this is the cornerstone of what we believe in.  All roads lead to Rule 1.  You can play around with this and say "They (are) always are rude", "They’re bloody annoying" or even "Cyclist(s) are nonces" but what is impoartant is that they are all the same nuisance and must be treated as such.